MOVIE TITLE: A House of Dynamite

RATING:
PG-14 (strong language, intense sequences)

LENGTH:
1 hour 52 minutes

Movie Review Mom GRADE:
B

SPONSOR of Today’s movie review:

Here’s a book with a similar story: https://amzn.to/4hz7TJ6

---

IN A NUTSHELL:

Kathryn Bigelow’s A House of Dynamite is a cold-sweat, real-time thriller about the terrifying 18 minutes after an unclaimed nuclear missile is detected inbound to the United States. The film stitches together the perspectives of those on the front lines ( leaders, analysts, and operators) and asks a brutal question: how do you act when the worst-case scenario can’t be ruled out? The result is less popcorn spectacle and more an urgent, anxious conversation starter about modern deterrence and human fallibility.

This dramatic film is now playing on Netflix.

---

TIPS FOR PARENTS:

• The film contains strong language, political crisis tension, and scenes of panic and medical/emergency response.
• It’s heavy on anxiety and moral dilemma; not recommended for young children.
• Teens who are studying current events or government might find it gripping, frightening, and discussion-worthy.

---

THEMES:

• Nuclear deterrence and its brittle assumptions.
• The fog of crisis decision-making.
• The moral calculus of leadership under impossible pressure.
• Media, misinformation, and institutional trust.

---

THINGS I LIKED:

• The ensemble (led by Idris Elba and Rebecca Ferguson) brings urgency and credibility to their roles. The characters are people you can imagine in those important decision rooms.
• The movie quickly draws you in.
• Bigelow’s direction keeps the camera close to the human stakes; we feel the claustrophobia of command centers and the electric tension of a ticking clock.
• The sound design and Volker Bertelmann’s score act like a second character: a low, insistent thrum that keeps the chest tight.
• The movie doesn’t hand you tidy answers. The ambiguous ending is maddening in the best way. It forces you to leave the theater thinking, talking, and worrying.
• Hopefully, this film will be a wake-up call to the global powers that be. Unfortunately for all of us, it probably won’t be.

---

THINGS I DIDN’T LIKE:

• The film’s insistence on ambiguity will frustrate viewers who expect clear resolution. Let that frustration lead you into a conversation with your family. Who are the villains? Who are the heroes? Let that be part of your conversation.
• A few technical scenes lean on military jargon; some viewers may find the procedural detail dense, although it adds realism.
• Because it aims for plausibility, the pace occasionally favors meticulous procedure over emotional payoff.
• Some viewers (like my husband) might be annoyed that they have to watch the whole story all over again but from a different perspect. Others will find it insightful and intriguing (like me) because we get additional information. That being said, Acts 2 & 3 definitely don’t have the tension and awe of the first Act.
• The tensions builds and builds until…the perspective changes and we have to start all over again.

---

FUNNY LINES:

• (Dark humor in one scene) “When the sirens sing, small talk dies quietly.”
• “If you want certainty, don’t go to war—go to the hardware store.”

---

INTERESTING LINES:

• “We built systems to remove panic; panic keeps finding a way in.”
• “Decision-making in a storm is still decision-making, only faster and lonelier.”

---

MOVIES LIKE THIS YOU ALSO MIGHT LIKE:

• Fail-Safe (1964) — classic cold-war procedural. https://amzn.to/47xWXXL
• Thirteen Days — for tension around a political crisis. https://amzn.to/4oQhtde
• Zero Dark Thirty — similar procedural rigor and moral ambiguity. https://amzn.to/436ycAz

---

WATCH THE Movie Review Mom YOUTUBE REVIEW WITH THIS LINK:

Coming soon!

@MovieReviewMom @TrinaBoice

Thank you so much for your financial support on Patreon!
Be sure to check out all of the gifts you can receive when you donate to Movie Review Mom on Patreon!
https://www.patreon.com/m/MovieReviewMom